Today,the thoery of evolution is regarded as fact. One of the ideas of evolution,is that mankind,was accidentally created by an explosion called the "Big Bang",and that man evolved into what we are today. Should such a theory be ragarded as a fact? What is fact? The word fact,means ,something that truly exists or happens,a thing done[1]. Can we say,that evolution has happend,or has been done? To answer, this question,one must use the "scientific method".

                      When reassessing,a scientifc theory(formulated ideas).The "scientific method",begins with observing,hypothosizing and then experimenting. Francis Drake,was famed for coming up with scientific methods to aproach scientific studies. Let us aproach evolution with the scientific method.

                       Evolution,teaches that creatures goes through a sequence of transition,caused by enviromental change. First of all,can we observe,such a transition? Is there evidence of an animal transforming? This qeustion is a major flaw in the theory of evolution. There has been no recorded acount,of any creature transitioning into a different creature. The British Museum of History  contains 60 million fossils[2],and yet we see no unidentified creature transitioning into a different creature. As you can see, without observing or seeing evidence of animals transforming into different animals, evolution falls short of the full implamitation of "the scientific method". Even the praised Charles Darwin admitted that evolution is not fact but instead fantisy by saying,"Unless transitional forms can be found in the fossil record,the thery of evolution is worthless speculations[3]. Evolution is not fact,it's  only fiction.

Sources of info1. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fact

                        2."The 10 Things You Should Know About the Creation vs.Evolution Debate" by Ron Rhodes

                        3.https://www.bcrevolution.ca/collapse_of_evolution.htm